Politics OnLine home

Politics OnLine UK

Uk Politics

November 2005

Blog

Anglican schism threat

A watched society

Daylight robbery

October 2005

I believe in...

In a world gone mad

September 2005

Hurricane Katrina

June 2005

an idea whose time had come

March 2005

The world that  we created

Rule of law breached

Terrorism and Law

December 2004

A most terrible thing

Identity cards

The morality error

November 2004

Butt out

Hunt ban

Colin Powell resigns

October 2004

US election

Fahrenheit 9/11

Troop request not political

Intentions

Hostage killed

The personal is political

Jobz for the Boyz

Dear Mike, Iraq sucks

Tory conference 2004

The right is winning.

September 2004

Do what you will

De facto terrorism

Brutal honesty

Perish the thought

New Iraq war

The hunt

August 2004

Terrorism threat UK

July 2004

Hazel Blears MP

Geraldine Smith MP

Acts of terror

War and people

Fahrenheit 9/11

June 2004

The Sun

David Westwood

January 2004

Hutton report

Michael Howard's Tories?

Camp Xray

What is going on?

Protesters arrested

Hutton enquiry

Young people

Oh happy day!

Making a profit?

David Kelly

Row over 'sexed up' report

TA sent to Iraq

Crooks in suits

Dealing with Spam

Pensions outrage

Ink Cartridge scandal

Extradite and be damned

No confidence

Desperately seeking safety

Response to Mr Blair

Personal comments on the Bll of Rights

Bill of Rights

 

Uploaded: 05 September 2003

Hutton enquiry. 

It would seem that Mr. Blair does have a certain flair for dressing things up, or giving the truth a bit of a helping hand, in order to seem more credible than he really is, this habit is doing him far more harm than good. I don't know anyone who has not been a little flexible with the truth at some point in their life in order to make themselves look better, but it is usual to outgrow it by at least ones late twenties. To continue to do this whilst holding the office of Prime Minister is, frankly, despicable.

The following quotes are from Mr. Blair's answers to the Hutton enquiry: 

'However, I also knew that it (the dossier) had to be a document that was owned by the Joint Intelligence Committee and the Chairman, John Scarlett (my italics) . That was obviously important because we could not produce this as evidence that came from anything other than an objective source.'

' it was important that it (the dossier) made the best case that we could make subject, obviously, to it being owned by the Joint intelligence Committee (my italics) and that the items of intelligence should be those that the agencies thought could and should be included. So if you like it was a process in which they were in charge of this, correctly, because it was so important to make sure that no-one could question the intelligence that was in it as coming from the genuine intelligence agencies, but obviously I mean I had to present this to Parliament. I was going to make a statement. Parliament was going to be recalled. We were concerned to make sure that we could produce, within the bounds of what was right and proper, the best case.'

The following memo was later produced and I draw your attention to the item, 'Ownership of the dossier'. Memo1 

The government felt it necessary to cover this with the following bit of flim-flam. Memo 2 

Memo 1 is a clear and unequivocal statement about ownership of the dossier, but once again Mr. Blair and his colleagues have to muddy clear waters, and in their bumbling attempts to produce a best case scenario (for themselves), they once again do the reverse. Clearly, any acquaintance with the truth in this high office is an uneasy one.

 

Keith Lindsay-Cameron 2003

Please submit comments and suggestions to: